Il trattamento omeopatico dell'emicrania nel bambino:i risultati di uno studio prospettico, multicentrico, studio osservazionale.
Homeopathic treatment of migraine in children: results of a prospective, multicenter, observational study.
Danno K1, Colas A, Masson JL, Bordet MF.
Author information
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
The study objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of homeopathic medicines for the prevention and treatment of migraine in children. Design: This was an observational, prospective, open,
nonrandomized, noncomparative, multicenter study.
SETTING/LOCATION:
The study was conducted in 12 countries worldwide.
SUBJECTS:
Fifty-nine (59) physicians trained in the prescription of homeopathic medicines and 168 children, aged 5-15 years, with definite or probable migraine diagnosed using International Headache Society
2004 criteria were the subjects in this study.
INTERVENTIONS:
Physicians were given complete freedom in terms of treatment prescription; thus, prescriptions were individualized for each patient.
OUTCOME MEASURES:
The frequency, intensity, and duration of migraine attacks in the 3 months prior to inclusion were compared with those during the 3-month follow-up period. Pertinent data were collected using
questionnaires completed by the doctor and the patient or his/her parent/guardian. The secondary outcome measure was the impact of homeopathic medicines on education, measured as absence from
school.
RESULTS:
The frequency, severity, and duration of migraine attacks decreased significantly during the 3-month follow-up period (all p<0.001). Preventive treatment during this time consisted of homeopathic
medicines in 98% of cases (mean=2.6 medicines/patient). Children spent significantly less time off school during follow-up than before inclusion (2.0 versus 5.5 days, respectively; p<0.001). The
most common preventive medicines used were Ignatia amara (25%; mainly 9C), Lycopodium clavatum (22%), Natrum muriaticum (21%), Gelsemium (20%), and Pulsatilla (12%; mainly 15C). Homeopathy alone was
used for the treatment of migraine attacks in 38% of cases. The most commonly used medicines were Belladonna (32%; mainly 9C), Ignatia amara (11%; mainly 15C), Iris versicolor (10%; mainly 9C),
Kalium phosphoricum (10%; mainly 9C), and Gelsemium (9%; mainly 15C and 30C).
CONCLUSIONS:
The results of this study demonstrate the interest of homeopathic medicines for the prevention and treatment of migraine attacks in children. A significant decrease in the frequency, severity, and
duration of migraine attacks was observed and, consequently, reduced absenteeism from school.
PMID: 22978244 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
_____________________________________________________
STUDIO ITALIANO CON UTILIZZO DELLA MEDICINA COMPLEMENTARE ALTERNATIVA (CAM) NEL TRATTAMENTO DELLA CEFALEA NELLA POPOLAZIONE PEDIATRICA.
Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use in an Italian cohort of pediatric headache patients: the tip of the iceberg.
Dalla Libera D1, Colombo B, Pavan G, Comi G.
Author information
Abstract
The use of complementary alternative medicine (CAM) in paediatric populations is considerably increased, especially for pain and chronic conditions, as demonstrated by epidemiological surveys both in
Europe and in the USA. In our study, CAM was used in 76 % patients of a cohort of 124 children affected by headache (age 4-16 years; 67 % female; 70 % migraine without aura, 12 % migraine with aura,
18 % tensive headache according to IHS criteria) consecutively recruited at a Pediatric Headache University Center. CAM was used as preventive treatment in 80 % cases. The main reasons for seeking
CAM were: the wish of avoiding chronic use of drugs with their related side effects, the desire of an integrated approach, the reported inefficacy of conventional medicine, and a more suitable
children disposition to CAM than to pharmacological compound. Female gender, younger age, migraine without aura, parents' higher educational status, maternal use of CAM and other associated chronic
conditions, correlated with CAM use (p < 0.05). 73 % patients chose CAM also to treat other diseases (i.e. allergies, colitis, asthma, insomnia, muscle-scheletric disorders and dysmenorrhoea). The
most assumed CAM were: herbal remedies (64 %) such as Valeriana, Ginkgo biloba, Boswellia serrata, Vitex agnus-castus, passion flower, Linden tree; vitamins/minerals supplements (40 %) with
magnesium, 5-Hydroxytryptophan, vitamin B6 or B12, Multivitamin compounds; Homeopathy (47 %) with Silicea, Ignatia Amara, Pulsatilla, Aconitum, Nux Vomica, Calcarea phosphorica; physical treatment
(45 %) such as Ayurvedic massage, shiatsu, osteopathy; yoga (33 %); acupuncture (11 %). CAM-often integrated with conventional care-was auto-prescribed in 30 % of the cases, suggested by
non-physician in 22 %, by the General Practitioner in 24 % and by paediatrician in 24 %. Both general practitioners and neurologists were mostly unaware of their patients' CAM use. In conclusion,
neurologists should inquire for CAM use and be prepared to learn about CAM therapies or to directly interact with CAM trained experts, in order to coordinate an integrative approach to health, as
especially required in paediatric headache patients and their parents. Further studies are required to investigate safety and efficacy of CAM in pediatric headache, as a possible side-medicine to
conventional pharmacological approach.
PMID: 24867852 (PubMed - in MEDLINE).